Living In the Shadow Of The Long Tail.
Ok, so we don’t know what the future of music is going to bring, but as artists we must be prepared. This preparation involves an examination of the present and how indie artists handle living in what is being called the ‘Long Tail’.
The Long Tail is a term that was first coined by Wired Magazine editor Chris Anderson.
It is actually a very simple concept that describes the phenomenon of the online environment. It operates on the principle that 20% of the artists earn 80% of the music income and 80% of the artists earn 20% of the music income. In recent times the top of the tail has become even steeper with closer to 5% of the artists earning 95% of the income.
John Hyde of Leftclick offers an interesting picture of his interpretation of the long tail. Oversimplified for the Sesame Sreet viewers in all of us but it gets the point across. Not only are we in danger of being caught in the Long Tail, we are also in danger of becoming fossils if we don’t make changes.
Personally I prefer the view portrayed by gapingview.com which shows that the term should in fact be “The Short Tail” given the massive body count that occurs.
Indie artist, Cathleen Trezza, (www.firewispmusic.com) commented in a recent forum on the main issue that exists with the Long Tail, “There’s a million bands out there vying for your attention to hear a song enough times to fall in love with it for a while and buy it. The problem isn’t the free part, really. After all, if you gave out free copies of a song and earned an album sale at a rate of 1 out of 10, or 1 out of 100, or even 1 out of 1000 freebies, you could say the method works to generate sales. If you send out your album to venue owners (for free) and it gets you the paid gig, you could say that free works. If you give out your album (for free) to libraries and licensing shops and they find paid work for you, you could say that free works.”
I have to agree with Cathleen Trezza’s comments. The issue is not “free” music, the issue relates to what an artist is prepared to do in order to get themselves heard. Living anywhere in the Long Tail other than the front 5% is a hard struggle, so do we give fans a taste test or do we give them a whole meal hoping they will come back for another meal?
The toughest issue is that platforms like iTunes have pushed the artists at the top of the Long Tail even further up while those artists who, by choice or by default, find themselves at the end of the tail struggling to survive.
So what do they do? The question in their minds really should be “Do I want to remain anonymous and sell my music to people who stumble across me? Or should I be doing everything in my power and using all the tools available to get my music heard, hopefully driving future sales?” Unfortunately, for an artist, often the only thing worse than free music (or even piracy) is anonymity. If you are anonymous it is a hard slog to build a profile.
One final point … as an artist going through iTunes, will you ever see the database of your followers and have the ability to market to them? No you won’t. What we (Cowbell Digital Music) want (and are setting up) is a database that an artist can use to directly market to their fans and fans of their genre. The only way to increase the database is to increase the fan base so does the trade off equal free songs for information? And if such powerful data is provided then I ask the question … did you really give away the song for free?
I know this is an unusual stance, coming from the CEO of a digital music platform, but something has to be done to get an artist ‘out there’. I would love to hear from artists on this issue as we are building a new digital platform that aims to address these issues. The only way we can do this is by listening to the artists that it will affect. Feel free to link, email me or comment on this post.
Shayne Locke
Cowbell Digital Music – It’s Your Choice














